Start each review with the borrower financials updated, covenants tested, and monitoring memo drafted.
Every borrower reviewed, every covenant recomputed from the borrower's own reporting, and the exceptions pulled to the front. Open any figure and follow it to the document it came from.
Synthetic borrowers — a demonstration, not a real portfolio.
Every borrower reports differently. The review shouldn’t.
The workflow is open source. Work with us to tailor it to your agreements and review process, or run the workflow yourself.
We adapt the workflow to your agreements, covenant definitions, committee requirements, and existing reporting format.
Definitions, add-backs, cure rights, amendments.
The checks, outputs, and format your team actually uses.
Install it, point it at a borrower folder, and adapt it yourself.
Every figure is source-backed and traceable to the underlying borrower document.
>Why is selvara-industrial-services 23.4% short?
Deteriorating headroom can surface risk before a covenant is breached.
Spot restatements, reporting changes, and widening variance to budget.
Late, missing, or incomplete borrower reporting is flagged as part of the review.
Same borrowers, same reporting cadence, same review process. The open source workflow handles the recurring work between the borrower package and the credit review, so your team starts with the analysis already prepared.
The workbook is refreshed, source-linked, and ready for review. Start with variances and exceptions instead of spreading and tying out the numbers.
Covenants are recalculated from source, movements are surfaced, and the key exceptions are organized before the review reaches you.
Each borrower runs through the same monitoring process, giving the team a consistent view of performance, covenant position, and emerging risk.
Four steps run every cycle. Two outputs come out the other side.
Bring in the reporting package, credit agreement, amendments, budget, and the checks that matter for the deal.
Map borrower reporting into a consistent P&L, balance sheet, and cash flow while preserving the link to source.
Apply the agreement definitions and recompute covenants from source, rather than relying on the certificate.
Flag covenant movement, variances, restatements, missing reporting, and other items that need review.
The latest period added to the existing workbook, with every figure traceable to source.
Key movements, covenant status, exceptions, and missing items — organized for review.
The workflow makes no credit decisions. It does the assembling, the arithmetic, and the checking.
Because the workflow is open source, nothing about it is a black box. Whether you run it yourself or we tailor it with you, you keep control of the files, the workflow, and the changes made to it.
The workflow works from your existing deal folders. No separate monitoring database for your team to maintain.
The workflow is open source, so your team can review how files are read, calculations are made, and outputs are produced.
Add a covenant check, change an adjustment, or update the memo format. Make the change yourself or work with us to adapt it.
Why inspectability and control matter when AI is working with credit files.
Read every line before you rely on it. It runs on your own systems, so nothing about the deal leaves.
Change a check, a dashboard, an add-back. Your team does it in minutes, not a vendor in quarters.
The whole workflow is yours, shaped to your process. How you operate AI is your operating model.
Install the plugin in Claude, point it at a borrower folder, and run the first review on the sample data before it goes near a live deal.
Works in Claude Cowork and Claude Code only.
https://github.com/100xopensource/100x-credit-monitoring
Start a new Cowork session and type “credit monitoring”. Then run your first review on either:
One call about your portfolio and your reporting cycle. If the fit is there, we build your version on one borrower first.
We’ve received your details and will be in touch shortly.
No borrower data in this form.